Comparative Different Software Development -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Comparative Different Software Development? Answer: Introduction The practical as well as the well defined mixture of various practices, procedures, techniques and methods to check the project quality that is being delivered can be referred to as project management methodology or project methodology in short. As per Walker, 2015, the most significant objective of this project methodology is the proper planning, controlling, developing and finally delivering a project with the help of successful process implementation. This implementation is extremely important for any project as if there is any problem in this implementation, there is a high chance that the project might be a huge failure. On the other hand, is the process is implemented successfully, the project becomes a huge success (Fleming Koppelman, 2016). The project methodology can be termed as the systematic and disciplined approach for designing and executing a particular project. Project methodology is responsible for achieving several objectives like fulfilling stakeholders requiremen ts. The stakeholders of an organization mainly include any one related to a project and these requirements should be fulfilled at any cost (Burke, 2013). Every project has one common language that can be easily understood by all the members of the projects for knowing the project requirements perfectly. Moreover, the estimation of project budget or project cost is done with the help of project methodology; this estimation is absolutely accurate and perfect. Another important advantage of project methodology is that it helps to resolve the conflict in projects. Since, it reduces the complexity of the project; there exists no conflict within the project and project members (Schwalbe, 2015). Furthermore, the deliverables that are solely expected are perfectly produced with the help of project methodology. The most popular and utilized project management methodologies are the Waterfall, PRINCE2, PMBOK, Agile XP and Agile Scrum. All these methodologies have significant merits and demerits (Larson Gray, 2013). There are two distinct types of project methodologies. The entire approach of project methodology is divided in two broad approaches, namely, traditional approaches and modern approaches. This traditional approach of project methodology can be defined as the sequence of consecutive phases in managing any particular project (Kerzner Kerzner, 2017). The complete execution of this project methodology approach is done in systematic manner and thus can be utilized for the successful design, development and project delivery. The proper and the most popular example of this traditional approach is the Waterfall model (Mishra Dubey, 2013). There are seven phases in this Waterfall model and each of the phases has to be executed for reaching to the next step. A series of sequences is under gone in this model. the second project methodology approach is modern approach. The main difference with traditional approach is that, modern approach never focuses on any type of linear processes. Information technology companies utilize modern approaches for their projects (Larson Gray, 2013). The most utilized and popular examples of modern approach are Scrum, PRINCE2, PMBOK and Six Sigma. A project methodology has a very important role in managing a project. It helps in executing the entire project properly and without complexities. A particular budget is solely followed in the project by this methodology (Schwalbe, 2015). Exclusive control is there on the project with the help of project methodology. Moreover, decision-making as well as problem solving becomes easier with this. Similarities and Differences between PMBOK and Waterfall PMBOK and Waterfall are the two most important methodologies in project management and thus help in successful execution of project (Snyder, 2014). Broadly, there are some of the major similarities as well as dissimilarities between the methodologies of PMBOK and Waterfall. The major similarities between PMBOK and Waterfall methodologies are give below: i) Reduction of Project Costs: The most basic similarity between PMBOK and Waterfall methodologies is that both of them helps in the reduction of project budget or project costs (Alshamrani Bahattab, 2015). Thus, extra cost is not needed. ii) Relevant Output: Waterfall model and PMBOK gives relevant and significant output for all the projects. Thus, all project managers broadly accept them. However, there are some of the most important dissimilarities as well. They are given below: i) Methodology Approach: The most basic dissimilarity between Waterfall and PMBOK methodologies is that PMBOK methodology is the example of modern approaches and Waterfall methodology is the significant example of traditional approach. ii) Project Type: This is the second important dissimilarity between PMBOK and Waterfall methodologies (Mahalakshmi Sundararajan, 2013). As Waterfall model is the example of traditional approaches, it subsequently follows a sequence of systematic procedure, this methodology is never used in any big projects. PMBOK, on the other hand is followed within all types of projects. iii) Guidelines: PMBOK methodology gives various guidelines for its users, however, no such benefit is present in the Waterfall model. iv) Speed: Waterfall methodology is slower than all other project methodologies and PMBOK is much more faster than the Waterfall. This is the fourth dissimilarity between them. Relating Waterfall with Project Life Cycle Waterfall project methodology can be termed as the best examples of project methodologies in managing any particular project (Model, 2015). This specific approach for linear sequence designing is solely provided for the development of software in any organization. This is a type of traditional methodology approach and it always follows the procedure of systematic sequence to properly execute any project. Moreover, the Waterfall model has extreme flexibility and slow, when compared to others (Mahalakshmi Sundararajan, 2013). Seven major and distinct phases are present in this Waterfall methodology. The phases of this model mainly include initiate, analysis, designing, construct, testing, deploy and finally maintenance. The major usability of this methodology is in small projects and all types of construction companies. It has a major role in PLC or project life cycle, since it helps in the execution of project sequentially (Alshamrani Bahattab, 2015). From the starting of the projec t, until the end of it, Waterfall model is utilized for sequential execution. It completes a PLC. References Alshamrani, A., Bahattab, A. (2015). A comparison between three SDLC models waterfall model, spiral model, and Incremental/Iterative model.International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI),12(1), 106. Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA. Fleming, Q. W., Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute. Kerzner, H., Kerzner, H. R. (2017).Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Larson, E. W., Gray, C. (2013).Project management: The managerial process with MS project. McGraw-Hill. Mahalakshmi, M., Sundararajan, M. (2013). Traditional SDLC Vs Scrum MethodologyA Comparative Study.International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering,3(6), 192-196. Mishra, A., Dubey, D. (2013). A comparative study of different software development life cycle models in different scenarios.International Journal,1(5), 64-69. Model, W. (2015). Waterfall Model.Luettavissa: https://www. waterfall-model. com/. Luettu,3. Pinto, J. K. (2015).Project management: achieving competitive advantage. Prentice Hall. Schwalbe, K. (2015).Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Snyder, C. S. (2014). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK () guide.Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA. Walker, A. (2015).Project management in construction. John Wiley Sons.